link States can’t regulate guns, but they can ban abortions — why?

As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.

Special announcement:

r/politics is currently accepting new moderator applications. If you want to help make this community a better place, consider applying here today!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.


Sounds like we need to make common sense abortion rights a constitutional amendment.


An ideological supreme court. It's not suppose to make sense, it's a religious conservative fantasy land.


Just wait till they set precedent by rolling back what the EPA can and cannot regulate (hint: nothing), opening the door for a roll back on any and all government regulations, so that we can take the fast lane to our globo-corporate overlords having exactly zero government oversight, if there’s even any government left over.

Decades of concerted conservative court packing is coming to a head. Things are going to get very, very ugly.


This must be one of the most destructive, partisan, and self-serving courts in the history of the modern judiciary. The Roberts court is hellbent on empowering a Christofascist state, damn the consequences.


Don't forget that states can ban books and words, too.

Children have prepare for the day they get murdered in their classroom, but we can't possibly let Little Timmy mention their two dads. That's going too far.


Because America is the land of gun care and health control


This title just seems false. From what I understand, SCOTUS made all states "shall issue", which doesnt take away regulatory process of getting a permit. It just guarantees that, if one does go through the process and passes, they are issued a permit without being denied for arbitrary reasons.


because SCOTUS is just a bunch of political hacks at this point. thats it. no "reading the constitution". no "originalism". just "how can we bend this as right-ward as possible?"


The plain answer- Guns are specifically protected by the constitution and Abortion is not.

Though, I disagree with that answer bc the 9th Amendment provides protection for rights that may not be enumerated in the constitution. Abortion should be protected as a right to privacy and it does not have to be specifically mentioned in the constitution to be protected.

That being said, I agree with the ruling on CCW permits. I do not think you should be forced to provide a reason to obtain a CCW. If you are eligble for it (Pass a background check, take a class and pass it, obtain licensure) you should be able to obtain the license. I know this is reddit, and this take won't be generally liked here, it doesn't change the fact that this was the right ruling here. However they are extremely wrong on abortion.

Edit: the support here was unexpected, lol

105 days ago source link